If you’ve been following the WordPress optimization series on this blog, you already know this site has been through some changes lately. We fixed security holes, set up Cloudflare properly, got caching working, cleaned up WooCommerce — the whole thing. That series documented every step of turning a quietly broken site into something that actually works the way it should.
This post isn’t part of that series. Think of it as what came after.
Once the foundation was solid, it made sense to look at the next layer: search. Because you can have a fast, secure, well-configured site and still be completely invisible in Google. That’s kind of where things were — the site was in better shape technically, but it wasn’t really optimized for search. So that’s what we started doing.
The Tool We Added
We installed SearchFit SEO — a plugin that connects directly to your Google Search Console data and gives you a proper SEO workspace inside WordPress. The reason this made sense over a more generic SEO plugin is that it actually pulls in real data about how the site is performing in search: which keywords are getting impressions, what pages are ranking (or not ranking), where there are gaps.
It’s the difference between flying blind and having an instrument panel.
The plugin sits alongside Yoast, which was already handling the meta titles, descriptions, and sitemap side of things. SearchFit is more about strategy and analysis — figuring out what to work on, not just whether individual posts are “optimized enough.”
What We’ve Been Doing
Once we had the data in front of us, a few things became obvious pretty quickly.
Some posts were getting impressions — meaning they showed up in Google search results — but had terrible click-through rates. The page was being surfaced, but the title or description wasn’t compelling enough for anyone to actually click. That’s low-hanging fruit: better titles, more specific meta descriptions, make it clearer what the reader is going to get.
Other posts were on page two or three of results for terms that were actually relevant. Not ranking high enough to get traffic, but close enough that some targeted improvements could move them. This is usually a content depth issue — the post exists, but it’s not comprehensive enough on the topic for Google to trust it over the competition.
And then there were the gaps — topics where this site has something useful to say, but doesn’t have a post at all. The SEO tool helps surface those by showing related keywords and what kind of search volume they carry.
So the work has been a mix of: cleaning up existing posts (titles, descriptions, internal links), expanding posts that are close but not quite there, and starting to plan new content in areas where there’s actual search demand.
Why This Matters for a Small Blog
I’ll be honest — for a long time I mostly ignored SEO here. I’d write something, Yoast would tell me the readability was “OK” and the SEO score was green, and I’d move on. That felt like enough.
But “green dot on Yoast” and “showing up in search results” are not the same thing. Yoast checks whether your post follows basic on-page SEO practices. It doesn’t tell you whether the keyword you’re targeting is one anyone is actually searching for, or whether the page is competitive, or whether your title is the reason nobody’s clicking even when you do show up.
That’s the layer we were missing. And it’s more interesting than I expected — once you see actual search data connected to your actual content, you start to see patterns. You realize which posts are quietly doing pretty well, which ones are underperforming relative to their potential, and where the real opportunities are.
What’s Actually Happened Since
Here’s what the work has actually looked like in practice, because “make changes and see what moves” is a lot more concrete once you’re in it.
The first thing we did was run a proper audit — technical health, on-page issues, and what Google Search Console was actually showing. A few things stood out immediately. The site logo was rendering huge on the homepage, pushing content way down below the fold. There was no description on the main tradelines store page. A couple of posts sitting quietly in positions 8–10 in search results — close enough to page one to be worth a push — hadn’t been touched in months.
So we fixed those things. The logo now has a proper size constraint (it was rendering at 240px, now capped at 80px — a small thing that makes the homepage actually usable on first scroll). The store page at kindoflost.com/product-category/tradelines/ got a real description explaining what’s there and why it’s different from buying through a broker. The schema markup on the homepage got cleaned up — there’s now proper structured data identifying the site and its author, which helps Google understand what it’s looking at.
The Posts We Improved
The more interesting work was on the content side. GSC showed two posts getting real impressions but almost no clicks: the Boost Credit 101 review and the Tradeline Supply Company review. Both had slipped into generic review-template territory — technically covering the topic but not sounding like anyone in particular wrote them.
We rewrote both in the same voice as the rest of the site. The TSC review now leads with how I actually found them (the Wealthy Accountant blog, which came from a Mr. Money Mustache forum thread), includes the specific story of the Bank of America card that got closed on me, and explains exactly how the day-to-day process works as a seller. The BC101 review got the same treatment — real details about the enrollment waitlist, the 24–48 hour window to add authorized users, which card issuers are risky and why.
Both reviews now have FAQ sections with structured data markup, which means Google can pull specific questions and answers directly into search results. Whether that moves the needle significantly I’ll find out over the next few weeks as the pages get re-crawled.
The Bigger Picture
The part that’s been most useful about this process is the GSC data itself. Before running through this properly, I had a vague sense that some posts were doing okay and others weren’t. Now I can see exactly which pages are getting impressions, at what position, and with what click-through rate. That changes what you work on.
For example: there’s a post about “remark code removed” that had nearly 4,000 impressions in 90 days and only 13 clicks. On the surface that looks like a massive opportunity. But when you dig into it, the impressions were almost certainly inflated because that post sat at the top of the homepage for a long time — it was the most recent post, so it was getting surfaced every time someone landed on the site. The actual search demand for that specific topic is much lower. Without looking at the data you’d spend time on the wrong thing.
The posts worth prioritizing are the ones in positions 8–12 for real search queries with consistent impressions — those are where a genuine content improvement or a better title could move them onto page one. That’s where the effort goes now.
More updates as things develop. If you’re running a WordPress site and haven’t looked at your Search Console data in a while, it’s worth an hour. The patterns are usually clearer than you’d expect.
Things that I use, like, and am affiliated with:
Mint Mobile offers great cell phone service for $15 flat, get $15 off using the link. Get discounted phones with service activation and no contract.
I never spend money before I check Mr Rebates or Rakuten to get cashbacks, rebates, discounts, coupons or cheaper gift cards.