Personal blog on early retirement, selling tradelines, and analytics projects. I write about what I learn as I am learning it.
If you’ve spent any time in FIRE circles or on personal finance forums, you’ve encountered the VTSAX vs VOO debate. Both are Vanguard funds, both are extremely low-cost, and both will make you more money over 30 years than most actively managed alternatives. The debate mostly comes down to structure and personal preference rather than any meaningful performance difference. Here’s what actually separates them.
If you’re curious about your financial health, one of the key metrics you’ll want to track is your net worth. In simple terms, your net worth is the difference between your assets (what you own) and your liabilities (what you owe). It’s a snapshot of your overall financial situation and can be a useful tool for setting financial goals and tracking progress.
Fair warning: I wrote this post after a genuinely frustrating afternoon dealing with Vanguard. I’ve kept it up because the complaints are real and I still hear them constantly from other investors. Take the title at face value—it’s rant-y—but stay for the part where I acknowledge what they actually do well, because that part is also true.
Continue reading “Vanguard Sucks”I’ve already blogged about Buffet’s annual letters twice: in 2018 I wrote about a few quotes, and in 2019 I wrote about some lessons learned.
Now I have to confess that after some six or seven years of reading them they are getting a bit repetitive, although there is always something new. This year the new thing is some interesting idea Buffett shares from a quasi-obscure book from 1924 I had never heard about before: “Common stocks as Long Term Investments” by Edgar Lawrence Smith.
After a few years of reading the famous annual letter from Buffett (tag) to his investors, and three years of following the live Yahoo! stream of the annual meeting in Omaha, last year I shared my impressions for the first time. Here is the second installment.
